"Anyone capable of getting himself elected president should on no account be allowed to do the job." Words of wisdom from
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Sometimes it takes quirky British humour/science fiction from a now-dead-guy to put things into perspective.
I'm voting Obama tomorrow. Then I'm going to Starbucks. I'm announcing this because, as a traditionally Republican state, my vote in Utah probably won't actually have any sort of impact on whether or not he gets elected.
I don't agree with Sean
Hannity that Obama is working to deny us our freedom. And I highly doubt that his first order of business will be to deny Good
Ol' Mr. H his
constitutional right of freedom of expression, take him off the air, and turn Hannity into the William Wallace of the "conservative underground, the conservative resistance."
Sure, Obama has some "radical" ideas about the way things are being run. One of these "radical" ideas is to overhaul the No Child Left Behind law. Right now, a school can be considering a failing school because one of the 50
checkboxes is not checked. One year,
Clearfield failed because only 93% (instead of 95%) of their math students took the test. All of the other boxes were checked. The average score was above the passing mark. CHS scored a 98% for their annual yearly progress. Do you know what the public heard? "
Clearfield failed. School on probation. Funding yanked." This is a system that wants us to treat every child the same regardless of disabilities and requires us to teach all students. And when these schools have problems with this, like getting their tenth grade special education students to the same level as their nondisabled friends, they are punished. Yet this same system, when a bunch of banks (who actually get to
choose their business practices, their customers, and who they lend money to) started going under, this same system threw money at them. And these same
CEOs who ran these companies into the ground were originally going to be keeping their very large salaries.
McCain wants to pay teachers based on test scores--so I, who don't get to choose my students, am held responsible for the scores of all of them, even the ones whose parents don't have any interest in their education and enable them in their skipping of class on a regular basis. If I have trouble teaching these students, my $35,000 a year (with three years experience and a master's degree) will be slashed. He wants to throw more money into the private school forum instead of using it to help me do my job in public education. He wants to simply "tweak" the
NCLB.
Honestly, I do love my job. I love it because it is
exhilarating to watch my students thrive. I love it because it is academically stimulating. I love it because of the discussions and thoughts that fly around when we really latch on to an issue. And I'm a good teacher. I'm not full of myself. I'm a good teacher because I try hard. I read the research. I implement researched teaching strategies and best practices. I base my curriculum on what my students have shown me they don't know through formal and formative assessments. Luckily, I still have some freedom as to how I go about passing these skills on to my students.
If we continue to put so much emphasis on testing, and start paying teachers based on their students' scores, we're going to see drill-and-kill classrooms. School will be boring and worthless to both students and teachers. And if it gets to that point, I see myself packing up and leaving because I need a job that is fulfilling. Getting students to open their eyes and think--that's what makes teaching worthwhile in spite of the paltry salary. Preparing them for standardized tests? Boring drudge work. And standardized tests pretty much prove only that we have developed students who know how to choose "C" when guessing and to always choose "all of the above" or "none of the above" when it is an option. Most of what makes education worthwhile, and most of what students take away from their years in the system, cannot be accurately tested in a multiple-choice format.
In all likelihood, if I do end up in another profession, it will be because McCain was elected, he didn't try to fix the education system, my job became tedious and boring, and I was held accountable for factors that are beyond my control while parents were not required to take an interest in their kids' educations. And I'm not alone. If you have kids or are thinking of having kids, you have to consider what schools will be like without an overhaul. And private schools and vouchers aren't the answer. As soon as private schools take government money, they are under government scrutiny--which means standardized testing. Private schools know that. When we fought the voucher issue here in Utah, the majority of private schools said that even if vouchers were available, they wouldn't accept them. And guess what--as a private industry, private schools have the right to turn away government funding.
Education is my issue and Obama is my guy. I don't agree with everything he stands for, but I'd really like to see my job become more meaningful, education become more fairly balanced, schools and teachers become better supported, and more great new teachers enticed into the field rather than repelled away from it.